Diving into the new SiriusDecisions Demand Unit Waterfall

webberoBranding & Marketing0 Comments


I’ve been a fan and an avid collaborator with SiriusDecisions since around the time when Rich Eldh and John Neeson gave birth to the company. I’ve found their frameworks especially useful in helping focus my teams’ actions and report on the value of our contributions. Perhaps you’ve found the same.

For many years, the SiriusDecisions Demand Waterfall has been used as the standard framework for managing demand generation processes. The beauty of the original Demand Waterfall was its clarity and simplicity. Built as a useful guide, it was never meant to become “the law.”

Yet over the past few years, many marketers have found themselves ensnared by a rigid, faithful type of application. From helpful leading indicators, we’ve created rigid sets of KPIs that lock us into a way of doing things and shape how we “see” our world. A host of short-sighted KPIs are now constraining our ability to innovate. At worst, they’re locking us into counterproductive behaviors that actually hurt our ROI. I’m talking here about KPIs that drive up volumes even as they drive down quality; about filters that ignore tangible evidence of demand in favor of titles and contacts at accounts that aren’t in the market at all.

The newly announced SiriusDecisions Demand Unit Waterfall concept contains major insights that could open the door to a new wave of progress. These observations should help keep many of us from going over the falls in a barrel crafted of our own short-sightedness.

Why a ‘lead’ just isn’t enough

It doesn’t matter how smart they are or how capable their stacks — until B2B marketers truly grasp how deals take shape at a prospect company, there is no way they can understand how to best help sales. Without an accurate picture of the buying team, it is impossible to target precisely, create relevant content or report truly meaningful progress. And so long as sales is only provided with “leads” as single individuals, there is far too much work remaining for sales to place much credence in what marketing keeps sending them.

Let’s be honest: before a salesperson (an intelligent human being) is willing to enter an opportunity into the pipeline (which is a very personal commitment based on their own ability to close a deal), there’s a whole lot more that they need to know than marketing has typically provided. What would you do if you were asked to compare the expected return from accounts that you know and are working to the “leads” marketing has passed over — individual prospects about which you understand very little? It’s no wonder so much tension still exists between even very good marketing and sales capabilities!

Clarity about the actual unit of demand

Now SiriusDecisions is clearing away more of the mist from its original waterfall to help us better distinguish between real demand signals and value-robbing noise. At the root of marketing and sales incompatibility, there’s long been an unbreachable chasm between how sales and marketing view the world. While I exaggerate a bit for effect, it’s not inaccurate to state that most sales organizations see accounts as the unit to activate on, whereas marketing teams concentrate on individuals and personas.

Building on CEB’s ground-breaking “Challenger Customer” buying process research on B2B, SiriusDecisions has synthesized this with their own studies to define the “Demand Unit” for B2B. They’ve now crystallized a concept that marketing and sales can both rally around.

Bridging the gap between the idea of unconnected individuals whose actions can’t accurately predict an opportunity and overly broad account definitions that can easily mask the potential for multiple opportunities, the “Demand Unit” clarifies how we should think about identifying and actioning real demand. It grows out of the already common understanding that in B2B, the Buyer is a group, and the much less recognized fact that there are potentially several such groups within a target account.

The codification of the “Demand Unit” now enables further conceptual progress in multiple directions — it’s good for targeting, nurturing, coverage strategy, cross-selling and upselling and much more. But what’s far and away the most exciting thing here to me is that for the first time, marketing and sales can be conceptually unified around what’s real, and therefore, what matters. For me, the bottom line is that with a demand unit articulated, sales can identify what they need help with, and marketing now understands more comprehensively what to go after. And with demand units clearly identified in a unified and agreed fashion, sales and marketing can finally align on how they really should invest and how well they are really doing, together.

Clarity about what’s actually out there

There’s another element to all of this. It’s an area that to me is even more obvious, but that somehow has often taken a back seat in various departments’ understanding of how they should proceed. In the earlier years of the SiriusDecisions Demand Waterfall, their rubric started with an “inquiry,” which has eventually come to mean a “hand raise” of practically any kind. One obvious shortcoming here was that, over time, we’ve lost the original thoughtfulness: that there’s a major difference between useful hand raises and those that are essentially meaningless.

With the updated framework, SiriusDecisions has added in two critical process steps at the top of the waterfall. Now it begins with Targeted Demand at the very top. I believe this will help drive out a couple of the wasteful behaviors that have become all too common. Too often, marketers come to me looking to spend good money on “leads” that will never, ever produce business. They do this because they have been sent in search of unrealistic volumes without reference to the true dynamics of their market. They don’t understand their total addressable market well enough.

Combining this new step with the Demand Unit idea ensures that we keep both our real potential, and the necessary strategies for pursuing it, top of mind. We’ll be less likely to try to take the “easy” but ineffective ways out.

Now, instead of inspiring marketers to stuff their funnels, business people and strategists will take a thoughtful step back to carefully assess whether there’s a problem at the top of the funnel at all. I’m confident that many more will start acknowledging the need to better diagnose what’s actually going wrong farther down in their processes. The work is hard, but real leaders are getting it done.

Clarity about what’s real

Yet Targeted Demand (a subtle but powerful improvement on Total Addressable Market because it uses demand units instead of accounts) is only part of the picture. It’s the second new section that gets me really excited. Calling it “Active Demand,” SiriusDecisions has now brought to life an idea that I wrote about a few months ago, when I said we needed to get our heads out of our funnels. Beyond the total addressable market, when given the chance, smart marketers all recognize that replacement cycles are real. They know that only a finite percentage of Ideal Customer Profiles (ICPs) are in the market at any given time.

[Read the full article on MarTech Today.]


Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily Marketing Land. Staff authors are listed here.




Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *